As the weather begins to warm up and our landscapes begin to show new life, we occasionally receive phone calls from homeowners and landscape professionals about plants that are exhibiting injury symptoms. These symptoms can range from minor yellowing of foliage even to death of plants. While a number of factors can cause this, a common one is injury from deicing salts.
Salt injury is generally limited to areas adjacent to an area that has received deicing salt applications during the winter, such as along roads, sidewalks, or patios. Salts that come in contact with foliage can cause burning and discoloration of the foliage. This type of injury can be significant depending on the percentage of the foliage affected, but the injury will generally subside once the foliage is rinsed by rainfall or irrigation. However, if high levels of salt enter the soil, they can continue to cause damage.
When salts enter the soil, they can change the way that water moves within the soil and cause the plants to be stressed by restricting the ability of roots to take up water from the soil, in essence causing water stresses similar to drought stress. These salts can also displace essential plant nutrients, leading to possible nutrient deficiencies within the plant.
However, not all landscape injuries that we observe in the spring are salt damage. Winter can be brutal on landscaping plants in other ways. Cold temperatures, extremely dry air and strong winds can cause many plants, especially evergreen trees and shrubs, to lose moisture rapidly, leading to browning of foliage. This type of injury, known as desiccation injury, may closely resemble salt injury, but can be found in plants away from deicing salt applications.
If salt injury is suspected, it is recommended that the soil be tested for soluble salts and sodium (Na), in addition to a routine soil test, to determine if salt levels are high enough to cause further injury to plants. By analyzing for these properties, you can assess the amount of impact that the deicing salt has had within the soil profile and take steps to mitigate its effects.
Correcting mild to moderate salt injury generally involves flushing the excess salt from the rooting zone. This requires thorough and repeated watering to cause the water to flow through the rooting zone, thereby reducing the potential for toxicity. This should be done as soon as possible to reduce further injury. In situations of very high salts or poor drainage it may be more practical to remove and replace the affected soil.
Did you miss sending a picture in for the 2018 A&L Great Lakes Laboratories calendar? You have another chance. The response to the 2018 calendar was great, and we are going to again ask for your pictures for the 2019 calendar. We want to see pictures that illustrate what fuels your passion for agriculture and customer service. When you get that picture captured, send it to news@algreatlakes.com along with your name and address. Please submit your pictures in the highest resolution possible before August 1st, 2018. In August we will select our favorite pictures, then we will be letting our followers on Facebook vote on their favorite, to be on the cover of the 2019 calendar. Follow us on Facebook for voting details.
Rules
The 2017 Soil Test Data Summaries for the Great Lakes region are now available on our website. The summaries are compiled for the Great Lakes region as a whole, as well as broken down by state and into geographic quadrants within each state.
The Soil Test Summaries are valuable tools that provide the average soil test levels for a given region, as well as the distribution of soils by rating. This data can be used by growers and advisors alike to identify regions where soil test levels tend to be low or high for a given nutrient, and can allow them to better focus their soil sampling and nutrient management priorities.
A&L Great Lakes has been providing soil test summaries since 1996, and the information provided has been used by countless agricultural professionals ever since.
As I sit down to write this article about Thanksgiving it would easy to focus on negative events that have occurred in my life and be grumpy and ungrateful. Family, friends and coworkers also have challenges. One might lose perspective or become depressed. Or put on a disingenuous smile and just “fake it”. How does one remain grateful when they aren’t necessarily “feeling it”?
Robert Emmons and Michael McCullough are two of the leading American investigators of gratitude. They describe gratitude as personality strength—the ability to be keenly aware of the good things that happen to you and never take them for granted. Grateful individuals express their thanks and appreciation to others in a heartfelt way, not just to be polite. If you possess a high level of gratitude, you often feel an emotional sense of wonder, thankfulness and appreciation for life itself.
A grateful person takes nothing for granted. Rather, they take a beginner’s thrill at a word of praise, at another’s good performance or at each sunny day. They are keenly aware of their continual dependence on others and the blessings they’ve been given. This is certainly counter-cultural to what we see in the general public and mainstream media.
Thinking back to the original Thanksgiving I remember that it arose from a very difficult time in history. Many pilgrims died from a rough winter. They certainly didn’t have any of the conveniences we have today. You’ve heard the saying that “Happiness is a choice” and perhaps “Gratefulness is a choice” as well.
Beyond rotten circumstances, some people are just naturally more grateful than others. A 2014 article in the journal Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience identified a variation in a gene (CD38) associated with gratitude. Some people simply have a heightened genetic tendency to experience, in the researchers’ words, “global relationship satisfaction, perceived partner responsiveness and positive emotions (particularly love).” That is, those relentlessly positive people you know who seem grateful all the time may simply be mutants. As an owner of a company, I want such mutants working for me!
So, I decided to take an informal survey among the employees at A&L Great Lakes Laboratories, Inc. I asked them what they were grateful for this Thanksgiving when it came to the lab, their workplace. Here is a sampling of some of the results:
“I’m Thankful”:
Amazingly, after speaking with the staff and hearing their comments I realized how much I have to be thankful for this season. I’m rebelling against the feelings that were bringing me down. Soil busy season is always a challenging time for any ag lab, but I’m so thankful that I get to go through it with grateful “mutants”! HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYONE
Greg Neyman, Vice-President/COO
Credits:
Emmons, R.A., and McCullough, M.E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 377-89.
Brooks, Arthur C (Nov. 21, 2015). Choose to Be Grateful. It Will Make You Happier. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/22/opinion/sunday/choose-to-be-grateful-it-will-make-you-happier.html
In previous articles, we shared Day 1 and Day 2 of our 3-part series in A Day in the Life of a Soil Sample.
Day 3 begins with data from the previous days analysis being compiled into spreadsheets for quality control review. The quality control review is conducted by a QC team consisting of a quality control chemist and quality assurance chemist.
The first spreadsheet contains the results of all known, blind, and equipment checks that were analyzed. These check samples account for approximately 10% of total samples. From this data, it can be determined if there were any instrument or technician errors throughout the process. A second spreadsheet reports any potential “problem” samples that do not meet a predetermined set of criteria. The third spreadsheet contains all data from that day’s analysis. This spreadsheet is thoroughly examined line by line to identify any unusual patterns or anomalies in the data, for both individual and groups of samples. Problem samples identified in the review process are also compared to the surrounding samples to determine if an error may have occurred in the testing process. Samples requiring reanalysis are identified, and a list is sent to the appropriate technician for reanalysis. When the analytical data passes the quality control review, it is approved and available for review by our Agronomists.
Our Agronomists review reports using a multi-screen computer application to view a pdf version of the final report alongside a scanned copy of the original submittal form sent with the soil samples. An Agronomist will first do a clerical check to ensure that the report is assigned to the correct account, that there are no spelling errors on manually entered information, and check that the customer is receiving the soil tests that they requested.
Agronomists then check the data to ensure that the analyses for a sample reasonably complement one another. If the Agronomist cannot rationalize the result based on the data or their experience with the soil in the region, the report is held for further investigation. An Agronomist’s first option is to check the physical sample to determine if there are any visual differences between the samples to explain the results. If the Agronomist is still not confident in the result, the sample is returned to the QC team for reanalysis of the questionable data. Once the Agronomist is confident that the results accurately represent the sample that we received, the report receives its final approval.
Once soil test data is approved, it is sent to our electronic reporting system. The data will be used to generate a pdf report and any data exports required by the customer for import into precision ag software. These data files are then automatically e-mailed to the customer. In some cases, the data is automatically transferred to the precision ag software for the customer to access immediately. All data formats, pdf reports, and an electronic copy of the original submittal form can be uploaded to eDocs, our file management system, where the information can be accessed at any time.
While growers throughout the corn belt faced challenging weather from spring planting through the growing season, weather has also been delaying soil sampling this fall. In Late September, much of the Great Lakes Region was dealing with dry soil conditions. These dry, hard soil conditions made achieving the proper soil sampling depth difficult when working with a hand probe or light hydraulic probe. We had reports of customers seeking out auger units simply to keep soil sampling on pace. In fields with spot replanting, many producers are harvesting around late planted soybeans, leading to partially harvested fields that are yet to be sampled.
The welcome rains blanketing the region through much of October helped alleviate the hard soil, but brought soybean harvest to a crawl for nearly two weeks in parts of the region. This break in the harvest allowed samplers to catch up, and many found themselves waiting for additional fields to sample. Looking forward, we see a sizable number of acres remaining, and the forecast for colder weather adds more uncertainty. In the midst of these challenges, it is critical to keep in mind that the goal should always be to capture quality data. Consistent sampling depth is perhaps the most critical aspect of sample collection, and every effort should be made to ensure that a uniform sampling depth is maintained in all conditions. Poor soil test data from improperly sampled fields can be much worse than no data at all. Keep your eye on quality, and the rest will fall into place.In a previous newsletter, we began our 3-part series in A Day in the Life of a Soil Sample: Day 1.
Day 2 for a soil sample begins very early in the morning. The grinding teams start by retrieving the bench sheets that were produced on Day 1 and the sample storage cups and trays corresponding to the lab numbers assigned to the day’s samples. Before each sample is ground, the sample ID from the original sample bag is double checked assuring that they are in the same order in which they were logged into the sample database. At this point, should a discrepancy be identified between the sample order and the bench sheets, the grinding team will note any corrections needed and report necessary changes to the office staff.
Now, soil grinding actually begins. The entire sample is dumped into a flail-type hammer mill which pulverizes the soil. The sample is held in the grinder for a minimum of three seconds to ensure that it is thoroughly homogenized. The sample is then released from the grinder through a sieve which removes any particles greater than 2 mm. The portion of the sample passing through the sieve is poured into a sample cup identified with its corresponding lab number. The sample is now ready for the next step in the process.
Dried and ground soil samples now move to “scooping”. A routine soil analysis requires three subsamples of each sample, one for measuring pH, one for organic matter, and one for nutrient extraction. These subsamples are scooped by hand. Each technician that scoops soil is carefully trained and routinely audited to ensure consistent scooping procedure. The volume of soil collected with each scoop is specific to the analysis being performed.
The first scoop is used for organic matter analysis. A single scoop is transferred to a ceramic crucible. The crucibles are arranged on specially designed trays that are first loaded into a holding oven to dry off any ambient moisture that may have condensed in the soil as it cooled down from the drying/grinding process. From the holding oven, each crucible is weighed. The trays are then transferred to ovens that heat the samples to the point where the organic matter is oxidized and released, and held at that temperature for a predefined time period to ensure that the organic materials are thoroughly evolved. The trays are then removed from the furnace, allowed to cool, and each crucible is reweighed. The percent change in weight for each sample is automatically calculated in the database and reported as the percent organic matter. This process is called Loss on Ignition.
The second scoop is used for nutrient extraction. This scoop is perhaps the most critical, and only our most experienced technicians are trusted with this task. The scoop is placed into a cup where it is combined with a carefully measured volume of extracting solution (typically Mehlich-3). The cup containing the soil - solution mixture is then agitated for a predetermined time period to ensure thorough mixing and to allow adequate time for the extracting solution to work, and the slurry is then filtered through a laboratory grade filter paper to remove the soil. The resulting solution is then transferred to a test tube and analyzed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES) to determine the levels of nutrients present in the solution and, by extension, within the soil.
The third scoop is used to determine the pH and buffer pH of the soil. This scoop of soil is placed into a disposable cup, and an automatic dispenser adds deionized water into each cup. The soil-water mixtures then sits for a set period of time before being stirred and measured by a pH electrode. The pH is determined on 10 samples at a time. Any samples that require a buffer pH analysis are identified and the Sikora buffer solution is added to the sample and the BpH is measured after a set period of time. The pH and BpH data is automatically transferred to the database.
Day 2 comes to a close with all of the raw data being generated and sent to the database where it will be ready for quality control review, agronomist review, and reporting on Day 3.Providing our customers with the highest level of service and keeping them informed is a priority for us. Our customer service department, consisting of Julie Bruggner and Mandee Munoz, is a critical part of the customer experience. They work hard to make sure that our customers get the service that they expect when working with A&L Great Lakes Labs.
Many of the calls placed by this department to customers deal with the submittal forms and the samples not matching. Occasionally, we don’t receive all the samples indicated, or alternatively we have extra or duplicate samples. We also receive samples with incomplete paperwork or no paperwork. Confirming that we are doing the right test on the right sample is crucial in meeting the expectations of our customers.
We make great effort to ensure that each sample is handled carefully and that issues don’t occur. However, things do happen, and calls are placed to inform our customers of this challenge. This dreaded task is also handled by this team. It would be much easier to not acknowledge the error, but honesty and integrity are essential in the work we are doing and a core value of A & L Great Lakes Laboratories.
When a customer has a question or an issue, this team is the first place for them to start. If they are not able to resolve it themselves, they will get you directed to the appropriate individual. They are here to assist our customers; they are the problem solvers. If you have not met Julie or Mandee, be sure to introduce yourself to them the next time you are at the lab. They love to put a face with that voice on the other end of the phone.Whether you are a livestock producer looking to utilize a by-product or a crop producer looking for an economical nutrient source, it is essential to know the nutrient content of your manure to make efficient and effective applications. The nutrient composition of manure can vary greatly depending on the livestock type, diet, and method of storage. A laboratory manure analysis can ensure that application rates are appropriate for maximizing crop yields and minimizing the potential for over or under application of nutrients which can cause yield loss or surface and ground water contamination.
The high cost of transportation and application equipment for manure can sometimes cause us to overlook the benefits of land applying manure. Manure is an excellent source of organic matter which, over time, can improve the physical properties of the soil. However, it is difficult to accurately place a dollar value on this benefit because the economics of organic matter are not well understood when compared with other inputs of crop production, but by comparing the nutrient content of manure to that of conventional fertilizers, a dollar value can be estimated for the manure.
The following example uses approximate prices for fertilizers of $0.35/lb Nitrogen, $0.35/lb Phosphorus (P2O5), and $0.25/lb Potassium (K2O). We will use the average nutrient analysis for two of the most common forms of manure found in the Eastern Corn Belt to determine a value based on the NPK content.
|
N |
P2O5 |
K20 |
Total |
Swine (liquid pit) lb/1000 gal |
36* |
25 |
22 |
|
Swine ($/1000 gal) |
$12.60 |
$8.75 |
$5.50 |
$26.85/1000 gal |
Poultry (w/litter) lb/ton |
47 |
48 |
30 |
|
Poultry ($/ton) |
$16.45 |
$16.80 |
$7.50 |
$40.75/ton |
*Not all N will be plant available in the first year after application. Availability is very dependent on weather and other factors. However, estimated first year availability is provided on the laboratory analysis report.
Application rate determinations should be based using the results of a recent soil analysis, as well as estimated crop removal. Appropriate application rates will not supply nitrogen or phosphorus in excess of crop needs. This means that supplemental applications of conventional fertilizers may be necessary to provide the total nutrient needs for your intended crop. For examples of these calculations and more information regarding manure analysis, please see the A&L Great Lakes Laboratories Fact Sheet titled Manure Analysis and Interpretations.
The A&L Great Lakes Laboratories, Inc. web store is a good way to conveniently and quickly place an order for all the bags, boxes and shipping labels you need. If you are new to the Store, here’s a quick tutorial for shopping online.
Please note that creating a Store account is not the same as creating an A&L Great Lakes Laboratories, Inc. corporate account.